https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Is there a reason why -fstack-usage doesn't output mangled name ? Yes, the output was supposed to be human-readable, that's why the location of the function is also output. > Wouldn't it better if it was consistent with other tools and as such could > be compared ? This would break backward compatibility though. > The patch is very simple, just bypass any demangling here since I don't > think it's the role of this method to demangle for you. Probably worth discussing so please post it on gcc-patches@
