https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90839
--- Comment #4 from Dmitrij Pochepko <dpochepk at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > ... I haven't tracked deepsjeng data passed for logL function specifically. I only measured totals. It might be not directly related to logL code execution time. I also measured separate synthetic benchmarks with loop-based and non-loop-based implementations (simple logL function calculation in a loop with adding result into accumulator). For 0 and 1 arguments I see about 2% slower numbers with synthetic benchmark on T99. Hope this info will help to anyone who'll decide to work on this patch.
