https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91933
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2019-09-30
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|10.0 |8.4
Summary|[10 Regression] ICE: tree |[8/9/10 Regression] ICE:
|check: expected class |tree check: expected class
|'type', have 'exceptional' |'type', have 'exceptional'
|(error_mark) in |(error_mark) in
|build_simple_base_path, at |build_simple_base_path, at
|cp/class.c:541 |cp/class.c:541
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
ICE started with r253266. Plus of course, if the testcase is valid, we need to
fix that too. The original testcase allows such non-odr-use accesses to
variables from containing functions, as long as they don't have mutable
members.
