https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91547
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
There's no such thing as unsigned integer overflow. That sanitizer doesn't
exist in GCC because it's dumb. The behaviour of that function is perfectly
well defined.
