https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91547
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- There's no such thing as unsigned integer overflow. That sanitizer doesn't exist in GCC because it's dumb. The behaviour of that function is perfectly well defined.