https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91469

--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The result is correct at least, so testing this patch.

(insn 72 69 14 3 (set (reg:SI 115)
        (mem:SI (plus:SI (mult:SI (reg/v:SI 92 [ _23 ])
                    (const_int 4 [0x4]))
                (symbol_ref:SI ("d") [flags 0x2]  <var_decl 0x7f0a63be1cf0 d>))
[1 d S4 A32])) -1
     (nil))
(insn 14 72 15 3 (set (subreg:V4SI (reg/v:SI 90 [ f ]) 0)
        (umax:V4SI (subreg:V4SI (reg:SI 114) 0)
            (subreg:V4SI (reg:SI 115) 0))) 3665 {*sse4_1_umaxv4si3}
     (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CC 17 flags)
        (nil)))

Reply via email to