https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90866
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > So my patch survives bootstrap and regression tests, can you please Martin > take the issue? > > Patch candidate: > diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c > index 944650cecd5..a9b1147a2e7 100644 > --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c > +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c > @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ get_stridx (tree exp) > off = TREE_OPERAND (ptr, 1); > /* Scale the array index by the size of the element > type (normally 1 for char). */ > - off = fold_build2 (MULT_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (off), off, > + off = fold_build2 (MULT_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (eltsize), off, > eltsize); > ptr = TREE_OPERAND (ptr, 0); > } Of course this shouldn't make a difference. The issue is likely a type mismatch and 'off' being a pointer type? Probably mem_ref_offset () should be used to extract it.
