https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85965
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hedayat Vatankhah from comment #12)
> AFAIK, this is a completely valid C++ code,
I don't think that's actually clear.
The standard doesn't specify when the comparison object must be invocable, so I
think it's conforming (but not very user friendly) to reject that code, and the
original example in this bug report.
