https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90365
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
clang is wrong.
OpenMP 5 clarified this, on combined/composite constructs clauses which apply
just to one of the constructs combined/composited together are considered as
present on those constructs and expressions in those clauses are used inside of
the construct (exception is target teams with 2 teams specific clauses).
So, this testcase is to be handled as
#pragma omp parallel default(none)
#pragma omp for schedule(dynamic, chunkSize)
for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) sink();
and at least that one clang handles properly.
