https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90163
--- Comment #3 from Roland Illig <roland.illig at gmx dot de> ---
(In reply to Daniel Santos from comment #2)
> Yes, this is mine. Does this only become untranslatable when feature is
> "static call chains"?
In German, this might result in:
%<-mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues%> ist nicht mit static call chains kompatibel
This would be a change of language in the middle of the sentence without any
indication. Therefore yes, I consider it impossible to translate.
> But given that, what would be the ideal way to present this?
Two variants of the warning:
static void warn_once_call_ms2sysv_xlogues (const char *feature, bool q)
{
static bool warned_once = false;
if (warned_once)
return;
warned_once = true;
if (q)
{
/* TRANSLATORS: %qs is either a command line option or the name of a
* built-in function. */
warning (0, "%<-mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues%> is not compatible with %qs",
feature);
}
else
{
warning (0, "%<-mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues%> is not compatible with "
"nested functions");
}
}
Either way, it's strange that the "feature" parameter is not used at all in the
!q case. That's only complicated because of the warned_once variable. If it
were possible to extract the warned_once variable out of this function, the
variant for nested functions could be called directly.
