https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90180
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2019-04-19
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Most middle-end diagnostics format ranges using the [min, max] notation (and
less commonly [min, max + 1) for half open intervals). If I'm reading the
s390.c code correctly, here (0..%wu) would be rendered as the closed interval
[0, %wu] by the middle-end. We should adopt the same convention throughout.
Thus confirmed.
