https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89929
--- Comment #19 from Nikolay Bogoychev <nheart at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #18) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #17) > > > > > > @Martin: > > > > > > Thank you for the detailed answer. This could work for now. I have a few > > > questions about it: > > > > > > Wouldn't that create issues in the future if AMD decide to release avx512 > > > for their CPUs? > > > > No, that will only require to add target(arch=amd-name-with-avx512). > > Does this mean that if I have an avx512bw+dq function, I'd have to have two identical versions of it that I have to target with arch=canonlake and arch=amd-something-with-avx512? Seems a bit... unellegant. > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Nick > > > > Let me investigate that. Thanks for opening the bug Cheers, Nick
