https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #72 from Jürgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #71) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #70) > > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #69) > > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #68) > > > Does this mean, "when building LLVM on OSX 10.14.2 using GCC as the > > bootstrap compiler"? > > > > (I'm not sure what's wrong here - if the compiler bootstrap succeeds, then > > the compiler should be able to process the headers - if the code is C11, > > then _Atomic should be accepted, if it's C++ then _Atomic should be mapped > > to volatile). > > I guess that means for some other piece of (C++) code there's some use of > _Atomic that's being messed up by including <sys/xxxxx> or some other header > that includes ucred.h. > > ... will try to repeat ... This issue was with the fixincludes from comment #45, not yet with the new one. I have to compile/bootstrap with the new fix tonight.
