https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90070
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Oh that is PR 22326 ....
Indeed it is. And your conclusion there ("we need some pass that does
this properly", instead of the current thing during expand) still holds,
too. (How do you do this btw, remembering all PRs?! :-) )
