[Bug middle-end/89889] worse code compared to clang with alloca()

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89889

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization
          Component|c++                         |middle-end

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is because LLVM promotes the alloca to an array that is "statically"
allocated on the stack.

I would say this is a bad micro-benchmark really.