https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89853
Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hi, the assembly of the most affected function does not change at all, just its
offset (is 0x10 bytes bigger). Aligning the loops in the function a bit more
avoids most of the slowdown but not quite all of it. In any event, this is a
microarchitectural problem that we probably cannot do anything about. Sorry
for the noise, I will check for this the next time before I report a problem.
