https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79022
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |diagnostic
Blocks| |89863
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> Adding a warning about this case seems genuinely useful, i.e. when the names
> match but in a different order.
>
So, since this is closed, I guess someone™ should open a separate bug for that
part?
> I'm less convinced that warning about mismatches like void f(int number) and
> void f(int num) is useful, as it would just be noise in many cases.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
[Bug 89863] [meta-bug] Issues that cppcheck finds that gcc misses
