https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83822
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |89863
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #2)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> > Is this from cppcheck again?
>
> Yes. Anything from me that has (style) or (warning) or (error) or
> (performance) in it is from cppcheck.
>
> >If so, I'm considering making a meta-bug for
> > all your bugs about things that cppcheck has found; remind me...
>
> Fell free to use any structure you like - as long as the cppcheck bugs
> keep getting fixed I'll keep reporting them.
I just opened bug 89863 but forgot the rule you mentioned here, so it looks
like I'll have to go back and add some more...
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
[Bug 89863] [meta-bug] Issues that cppcheck finds that gcc misses
