https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89536
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > How is BIT_NOT_EXPR expanded for the prec > 1 BOOLEAN_TYPEs btw? If it is > normal QImode or SImode etc. one's complement, then I'd say it is a bug if > match.pd generates such BIT_NOT_EXPRs. No idea about the question, but I would agree with the conclusion.
