https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44263
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work| |4.5.3, 7.1.0
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Summary|missing diagnostic on |[7/8/9 Regression] missing
|questionable array sizes |diagnostic on questionable
|with -pedantic |array sizes with -pedantic
Known to fail| |4.6.0
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think the report here is specifically about the missing C++ warning. r230365
restored the pedantic warning:
r230365 | jason | 2015-11-13 19:08:05 -0500 (Fri, 13 Nov 2015) | 59 lines
Merge C++ delayed folding branch.
The diagnostic was an ancient regression introduced in GCC 4.6. Prior to that,
GCC gave errors:
In function 'void foo()':
pr44263.c:12:52: error: size of array 'g' is not an integral
constant-expression
pr44263.c:13:46: error: size of array 'h' is not an integral
constant-expression
The most likely revision of those identified by my bisection was r159800:
r159800 | ebotcazou | 2010-05-24 18:03:09 -0400 (Mon, 24 May 2010) | 3 lines
PR middle-end/44100
* typeck.c (cp_build_unary_op): Fold offsetof-like computations.
