https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51253
--- Comment #25 from Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin at gmail dot com> ---
I wasn't referring to the warnings though but incorrect code generation. Since
is exhibited by pretty trivial test cases (testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist86.C
confirms that { i++, i++ } works but the analogous test for { ++i, ++i } fails)
yet was first reported long after this bug was marked "FIXED" I kind of assumed
it was a regression, but apparently it was just never really fixed to begin
with.
