https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88739
--- Comment #46 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #44) > Created attachment 45523 [details] > workaround > > So I am testing the following workaround, at least "most suitable" for > branches. > It avoids generating affected BIT_FIELD_REFs (with bases with integral types > that have a precision not matching the size of the mode). > > Can arm folks please test this patch and aid me (provide) a dg-torture > testcase that currently fails? > > It builds OK on x86_64-linux, I'll test it with the endianess test commented > out to see if there's any testsuite fallout. > > Thanks. No regressions on x86_64-linux when also enabling there.
