https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953
--- Comment #28 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > For a quick check, I just tried it on > c-c++-common/asan/heap-overflow-1.c at -O0 > > #0 0x11258 in main > /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asan/heap-overflow-1. > c:21 > > vs. -O1: > > #0 0x1121c in main > /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asan/heap-overflow-1. > c:24 > > -fno-delayed-branch made no difference. What about -fasynchronous-unwind-tables?