https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Sorry, I forgot. Here is the correct data:
alpha 100.834%
arm 100.040%
c6x 100.000%
csky 100.039%
h8300 100.000%
i386 100.000%
microblaze 100.000%
mips 100.000%
mips64 100.029%
nios2 100.000%
parisc 100.025%
parisc64 100.017%
powerpc64 100.000%
riscv64 100.034%
s390 100.000%
sh 100.006%
shnommu 100.002%
sparc 100.001%
sparc64 100.001%
x86_64 100.000%
(so pretty much the same, but the previous runs had some weird pollution).
