https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79398
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #0)
> > The error below is a bit confusing: the definition of B::bar() is complete
> > when it's called.
> >
> > I think I understand that the reason for the error below is actually that
> > the function is called before the definition of the class of which it's a
> > member is complete. The error should make that clear, although it seems
> > that accepting it (e.g., as an extension) would make static constexpr member
> > functions quite a bit more useful.
>
> Confirmed. If accepting it as an extension, sounds like material for
> -fpermissive.
C++ FE maintainers, is this something you'd want to do?
