https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87777
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Boulenguez <nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr> --- Created attachment 44952 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44952&action=edit consensual gnatchop part of the previous patch The gnatchop bits are now separated, and have nothing specific to Debian. I am not interested in writing a separate patch fixing the End_Of_Prefix error as long as the function is not fully specified. For this, I need you to tell me what "a Debian quirk" is. Does some (non Debian) architecture - use TARGET-gcc-VERSION with TARGET/=Sdefault.Target_Name? - use TARGET-gcc-VERSION with VERSION/=Gnatvsn.Library_Version? - provide no executable named TARGET-gcc-VERSION? If the answer to all 3 questions is "no", then the current patch already makes sense for upstream as well as for Debian.
