https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87840
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh at inai dot de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #5 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh at inai dot de> ---
Must have made a mistake somewhere in the g++9 invocation... so I just reran a
number of flag combinations to be sure, and now observe:
14:39 a4:~ > export ASAN_OPTIONS="verbose=111:leak_detect=1"
14:39 a4:~ > export LSAN_OPTIONS="$ASAN_OPTIONS"
14:39 a4:~ > g++-8 -ggdb3 -fsanitize=leak x.cpp; ./a.out
14:39 a4:~ > g++-8 -ggdb3 -fsanitize=address -fsanitize=leak x.cpp; ./a.out
[blah]
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 32 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s).
14:39 a4:~ > g++-9 -ggdb3 -fsanitize=leak x.cpp; ./a.out
[blah]
SUMMARY: LeakSanitizer: 32 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s).
So it does work, if only the right flags are used.
