https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71422
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> > > IMNSHO gcc shouldn't, after all, if you just put each into a separate CU,
> > > gcc won't even see them together. It should be linker's responsibility to
> > > complain.
> >
> > What if you use LTO?
>
> WAITING on a reply to this
No reply; assuming that LTO can't actually do anything and that this is
actually a linker issue as Jakub suggested.
