https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87795
--- Comment #6 from pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Joel Sherrill from comment #4) > I added myself as a CC because I want to see if these become errors or > warnings. For core parts of RTEMS, I can see wanting these to be errors > since it indicates we did something in core OS code that did not achieve the > desired results. But in application code, it might not be as well considered > or necessary. Interesting point. The current case that is rejected (alignment of variables) is an error, so for consistency I'd say the other cases should do likewise. If there is a desire to make too-large alignment into a warning, that might be better handled as a separate issue. It could be a switch of some sort. If changes are made, they should apply consistently to alignment of all kinds.
