https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85669
--- Comment #26 from Wilco <wdijkstr at arm dot com> --- (In reply to Douglas Mencken from comment #25) > (In reply to Wilco from comment #24) > > > Yes the stage1 compiler would be fine or alternatively use > > --disable-bootstrap to get an installed compiler. > > I’m yet at libstdc++ of stage2 (which means that it succeeded the place of > failing) for 8.2 patched with the reversion I’ve just published. About four > hours and I’d get working 8.2 If that's the case then STACK_BOUNDARY is incorrect. So what is the actual alignment on Darwin, 8-byte alignment? How are Altivec instructions handled which do require 16-byte alignment? > Or do you want to look at results with your r251713? Does it matter? Either would be interesting - it would show what alignment the prologue really uses and what code it generates for alloca.
