https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87682
Bug ID: 87682 Summary: gcc/mem-stats.h:172: possible broken comparison operator ? Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com Target Milestone: --- gcc/mem-stats.h:172]: (style) Same expression on both sides of '&&'. Source code is inline bool operator== (const mem_usage &second) const { return (m_allocated == second.m_allocated && m_peak == second.m_peak && m_allocated == second.m_allocated); } Looking at nearby operator <, shouldn't this be inline bool operator== (const mem_usage &second) const { return (m_allocated == second.m_allocated && m_peak == second.m_peak && m_times == second.m_times); }