https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87523

            Bug ID: 87523
           Summary: ICE: Closures apparently fail to capture constexpr
           Product: gcc
           Version: 7.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: williamtnavarre at mail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Possibly related to PR 86429? 

It's not exactly the same because in this test case there is a failure even
though I'm not even demanding that the compiler necessarily consider the the
captured variable constexpr. 

This is the full file below. No #include is required to observe the failing
behavior. 

From g++ --version: g++ (Ubuntu 7.3.0-27ubuntu1~18.04) 7.3.0
Command: g++ -std=c++17 inp.cpp

===
template <typename T, T v>
struct my_integer_constant {
    constexpr my_integer_constant() {}
    constexpr operator T() const { return v; }
    constexpr T operator()() const { return v; }
};

template <typename T, T... u>
struct constant_call {
    template <typename Callback>
    static void call(T v, Callback f) {
        char dummy[sizeof...(u)] = { ( (v == u) ? (f(my_integer_constant<T,
u>{}), static_cast<char>(0)) : static_cast<char>(0))... };
        (void)dummy;
    }
};

void f(bool reverse_in, bool other_bool_in) {
    auto helper = [&] (auto reverse_t) {
        bool constexpr reverse_v = reverse_t;
        (void)reverse_v;
        constant_call<bool, true, false>::call(other_bool_in,
                                               [&] (auto newb) {
                                                   bool reverse_v_dyn =
reverse_v;
                                               });
    };
    constant_call<bool, true, false>::call(reverse_in, [&] (auto reverse_t) {
            helper(reverse_t);
        });
}
===
Output includes: 

./table/src/inp.cpp:23:57: internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at
cp/pt.c:14588
                                                    bool reverse_v_dyn =
reverse_v;
                                                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reply via email to