https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87395

--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #7)

> Bazinga! And now I might a number error again.... PR87259 -> PR87359.

There have been occasions where I thought that having a checksum
on PR numbers might have been a good idea :-)

Reply via email to