https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87395
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #7) > Bazinga! And now I might a number error again.... PR87259 -> PR87359. There have been occasions where I thought that having a checksum on PR numbers might have been a good idea :-)