https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87373
--- Comment #19 from Murat Ursavaş <murat.ursavas at gmail dot com> --- Hi Richard, This source code had been designed to see word by word access and may create expected results. I'm not sure about that. Let me use latest stable and see what happens. It wasn't plug and play last time but like I said I have to make sure I'm not the root cause. (Looks like I'm the usual suspect at this :) Thanks for verifying that this is the expected code, just longer due to more conservative access style. This could take a while as I'm struggling to find some extra time to pursue these.
