https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71157
--- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #10) Yes, the warning should use the %G directive. It might be worth reviewing all the middle-end warnings for this improvement. Unless we get rid of %G/%K first and make GCC print the inlining stack unconditionally.