https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32497
--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Valeriy E. Ushakov from comment #8) > I don't understand. The title mentions sh3, which is not obsolete. > Sorry, I misunderstood the sh numbering system when asking that last night (it was late and I was tired)
