https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86306
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6) > Because you are just blindly copying things from one bugzilla to the other, > without making any effort to check if what you are reporting is sensible. For example, in Bug 86305 you said that g++ segfaults on the code. That's complete nonsense. You just took the title of the clang bug and changed "clang" to "g++" even though g++ does not segfault on the code. Do you really think that is helpful?
