https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85998
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2018-05-30
Resolution|INVALID |---
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jeff Hammond from comment #5)
> > Finishing C++17 support in libstdc++ is already one of our top priorities
> > for
> > GCC 9. There's no need to ask for it, and doing so won't affect priorities.
> > The missing pieces are documented:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/status.html#status.iso.2017
>
> That page says nothing about priority of parallel STL or the GCC 9 roadmap.
There are no priorities to document (and it's the manual, it documents the
current status, so of course there are no priorities there anyway). Work gets
done when it gets done.
We are working to complete C++17 support for GCC 9. It will be complete when
it's complete.
> For "The Parallelism TS Should be Standardized" it says Status=No.
Because that's the status.
