https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85958
--- Comment #3 from Jonny Grant <jg at jguk dot org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > (In reply to Jonny Grant from comment #1) > > My idea of what would be clearest is :- > > > > Cannot pass ‘const int‘ as ‘int&‘ (non const) > > I don't think that's an improvement at all. > > But "... discards const qualifier" or "... discards volatile qualifier" or > "...discards const and volatile qualifiers" might be OK. Or saying "as > reference of non-const type 'int&'" similar to my proposed fix for PR 53281. Sounds good. I support this improvement!
