https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85975

--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> Stephan,
> 
> I tried the simply patch suggested in your analysis and
> it does fix the problem.  I need to extend the patch to
> fix the m4 files that utilize the macro as the 'b' 
> parameter is no longer needed.
> 
> I've also Paul to the CC list.  He finished and sheparded
> the array descriptor reform into the tree.  Paul, does 
> Stephan's analysis look correct?

Yes, the logic is impeccable and the patch still better :-)

Thanks for the report and the fix, Stephan.

Steve, can you do the honors with this please? I am still pressed by daytime
work and will be for another two-three weeks.

Paul

Reply via email to