https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85881
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
Assignee|rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org>
---
The result of expand appears to be identical apart from different pseudo
register numbers: after the patch we generate fewer unused pseudo register
numbers than before. So I think this is another case of different pseudo
register numbers giving different register allocations.
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org>
---
Reverting r256590 (the fix for PR80481) makes the test pass again, so I think
this is really an RA problem. Vlad?
