https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290
--- Comment #14 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #12) > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #11) > > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10) > > > Note this needs at least: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg02837.html > > > > > > > This was approved; has it been committed yet? > > Yes. That patch was applied. But that patch is only a support patch and not > the full patch to fix this. I was actually going to working on this again > but it won't go in until gcc 9. It's gcc 9 now.
