https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85448
--- Comment #5 from francois.jacq at irsn dot fr --- On Thursday 19 April 2018 16:30:09 you wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85448 > > --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> > --- > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 09:07:15AM +0000, francois.jacq at irsn dot fr wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85448 > > > > --- Comment #3 from francois.jacq at irsn dot fr --- > > Notice that this is a regression : The version 4.8.5 returns the result I > > expected... > > Or it was a bug in 4.8.5 and is now fixed. > > Now, the version where you rename odopen from m1 > to odopen_m1 is probably a bug. No : both are bugs (and probably identical). The bind clause cannot change how the procedure name "odopen" has to be considered from the Fortran side ! Intel, Oracle and Nag compilers agree with me.
