https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85393
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ok, it is the fix_up_crossing_landing_pad function that is buggy.
It simply assumes that a landing pad basic block contains only the landing pad
instructions and nothing else; as this testcase proves, it is a wrong
assumption.
Either we could really duplicate the bb, or, IMHO better, instead of partially
duplicating it just emit a label and jump (cross partition) to the existing
landing pad.
