https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85361
Will Hawkins <whh8b at virginia dot edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WORKSFORME |---
--- Comment #2 from Will Hawkins <whh8b at virginia dot edu> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> It's been a GCC extension so you need -pedantic or -pedantic-errors.
Got it! Thank you for your response!
But, shouldn't that behavior be isolated to the gnu90 standard rather than the
c90
c89
iso9899:1990
standards?
