https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85190
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|i?86-*-*, powerpc64-*-*, |powerpc64-*-*, spu-*-*
|spu-*-* |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2018-04-10
Component|tree-optimization |testsuite
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
HJs testers do not show the failure on i?86 anymore. The other regressions
must be older, likely since testcase introduction in June 2017 which means
they are a testsuite issue.
Rainer, the rev. range you quoted was for the i?86 FAIL, right?
Bin, can you check with a cross what happens for powerpc64 and spu and
adjust/XFAIL the testcase accordingly?
Confirmed for powerpc64-* by looking at gcc-testresults.
