https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85173
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I wonder if we shouldn't do:
--- gcc/explow.c 2018-01-03 21:21:39.012907765 +0100
+++ gcc/explow.c 2018-04-04 08:58:04.716738887 +0200
@@ -1625,6 +1625,7 @@ set_stack_check_libfunc (const char *lib
void
emit_stack_probe (rtx address)
{
+ address = memory_address (word_mode, address);
if (targetm.have_probe_stack_address ())
emit_insn (targetm.gen_probe_stack_address (address));
else
because it is tedious to do that in every emit_stack_probe caller. Wonder why
all the other target happen to work even without something like that (ok, some
targets allow signed 32-bit offsets and maybe we never generate larger
offsets).
