https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63734
--- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #9) > (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #8) > > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #7) > > > 5 branch is closed > > > > You closed the PR, so does that mean you checked and it is fixed at least on > > trunk? > > I thought that if it were still an issue on trunk, the title would have said > [6/7/8 regression] instead of [5.0 regression]. I don't think that's a completely reliable indicator, in the absence of any other information in the PR. I don't know if the title update is automatic when a new branch is created, maybe it is but didn't happen here because it says "5.0 Regression" instead of "5 Regression"... Anyway, I just looked at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2018-03/msg01741.html and don't see any "vshuf" failure, it seems to have disappeared (probably just went latent), so everything is fine.
