https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84847
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #14) > Created attachment 43643 [details] > Proposed patch > > Hi Guys. > > Here is a possible patch, although it is a bit hackish. > Richard might not like it because it changes gcc/lto-wrapper.c rather than > the linker, but I honestly think that the linker is doing the right thing > in this case. > It should be fixed in linker.