https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84190
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
In response to DR476 the C standard has been clarified (or is in the process of
being clarified, as the DR is still open) that a "volatile access" is intended
to mean an access to an object via a volatile-qualified lvalue. I believe C++
has discussed adopting a similar clarification in response to the C DR, if it
hasn't done so yet.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/summary.htm#dr_476
