https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141
--- Comment #23 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> --- Hi Everybody, I just got in from the lab.. Obviously, I will not be working on this problem tonight! I suspect that fact that I have had to pick out allocatable components for special treatment is the smoking gun. I will be giving the large chunk of specialised code devoted to allocatable components in trans-array.c a good looking over tomorrow. Somewhere, a perfectly good dtype is being overwirtten with zeros.... Paul On 1 February 2018 at 22:23, juergen.reuter at desy dot de <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 > > --- Comment #22 from Jürgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> --- > I'm actually running our code right now. It fixes _almost all_ of our unit and > functional tests. There is still one failing unit test and at least one > failing > functional test. Still waiting for the full results. Will try to add a > reproducer for the test. For the unit test that is straightforward, for the > functional test maybe not so much. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. > You are the assignee for the bug.
